Posted 11 years ago
Agram.m
(762 items)
This pendant brooch I could not leave for a incredibly low price.
In my opinion it is a very old piece given the method of setting the stones. After checking to be tiny diamonds (senailles) were found to be set in silver. The back and upper and lower part of this piece of gold.
Because my fantastic pendant a la Jeanette (already showed here some two years ago see link:
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/74361-the-beauty-of-antique-diamond-jewels this is the same type of jewelry. I date this jewel end 18de century or perhaps still earlier . What is your opinion?
very BEAUTIFUL!!
SEAN68 you are so incredibly fast! Thanks for the compliment and loving.
pops52 and Manikin thanks a lot for loving
Petey thanks for your interest
It's very unusual Agram in style and method. I know nothing about jewellery but it looks old ...I think it's wonderful!
racer4four something special that you always give me such a nice and friendly answers. Of course, I agree with you. I also think it's an old gem. Thank you for getting so kind words
southcop thanks for loving
Stunning absolutely Stunning
JueBoo, thanks for your interest, compliment and loving!
Vetraio50 thanks for loving
tom61375 thanks for interest and loving
nutsabotash6, THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMPLIMENT ! But this feature requires two things it is necessary to find beautiful things and then see that you get them in your possession and I'm quite lucky I assume.
Moonstonelover21 thanks for your interest and loving
I agree this is an early piece, 18th century. You're lucky but you also know where to look!! keep it up :)
BelleEpoque thank for your valuable comment and loving. And i agree i know where to look and hope to be able to keep it up that way.Hope to "meet" you soon again!
Newtimes, freiheit and Manikin thanks for your attention and loving.
valentino97 thanks for your interest and loving
MrsWarren thanks for your interest and loving
What you have is the top half of an 18th century French silver cross. The sides and bottom have been broken off and the brooch fitting has been added much later. You'll find a picture of the exact same cross (but intact), on my website
http://www.bijouxregionaux.fr/en/contenu.php?idcontenu=15
The photo was given to me by the dealer whose name you'll find when you click on the photo, I have no idea if it is still for sale. Marc
http://www.bijouxregionaux.fr/fr/ckfinder/userfiles/images/petits/croix-normande-or-et-diamant-recto.jpg
I think you can see the cross if you click on this link
French-jewellery-fan,
Dear Mark,
Sorry it took some time before I could answer. I am really very grateful to you because you have shown me the right way to discover that my cross pendant is not quite complete. It is fantastic to learn so much more about the jewelry on your sitefrom France and Belgium which I also have some in my possession.
Just like you, I am actually all my life (from adulthood) mesmerized by jewelry and an avid collector. But as I discovered once again a man is never stop learning, even in antique jewelry.
You have limited time and I understand that, but you'd still like to look at my jewelry from France last. Especially the brooch with the secret compartment intrigues me, but I am nothing came to know about it.
Once again thank you very much and I hope that we may enjoy collectors also occasionally your knowledge and expertise here at CW.
Here are the two links of my “blue enameled jewelry”:
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/24376-gegorgian-or-victorian-cobalt-blue-ename
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/1944-stunning-enameled-brooch-with-rose-cut-d