Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Aquamarine Ring

In Fine Jewelry > Aquamarine Jewelry > Show & Tell and Fine Jewelry > Art Deco Jewelry > Show & Tell.
Newtimes's loves661 of 1566A tribute to the super moon!Art Deco Uncas Sterling & Rhinestone Ring
12
Love it
0
Like it

auraaura loves this.
kyratangokyratango loves this.
twentiethcenturytwentiethcentury loves this.
freiheitfreiheit loves this.
NewtimesNewtimes loves this.
RadegunderRadegunder loves this.
DrFluffyDrFluffy loves this.
Woman34Woman34 loves this.
Peasejean55Peasejean55 loves this.
aghcollectaghcollect loves this.
Moonstonelover21Moonstonelover21 loves this.
See 10 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 10 years ago

    srwolson
    (4 items)

    My best guess at this ring is that it's an emerald cut aquamarine art deco filigree ring. It has "18K" pressed into the inside of the band. We bought it at an antique store about 5 years ago. Wondering if anyone else has any additional information. Thanks!

    Mystery Solved
    logo
    Aquamarine Jewelry
    See all
    Vintage 14k Yellow Gold Aquamarine emerald Cut Post Prong Earrings Gently Used
    Vintage 14k Yellow Gold Aquamarine ...
    $425
    Vintage Jewellery Gold Ring with large Aquamarine Antique Deco Dress Jewelry
    Vintage Jewellery Gold Ring with la...
    $191
    9ct Gold Aquamarine Vintage Drop Dangling Earrings, 9k 375
    9ct Gold Aquamarine Vintage Drop Da...
    $21
    14ct Aquamarine Ring 9ct Gold Art Deco Aquamarine Vintage Ring - Size N
    14ct Aquamarine Ring 9ct Gold Art D...
    $626
    logo
    Vintage 14k Yellow Gold Aquamarine emerald Cut Post Prong Earrings Gently Used
    Vintage 14k Yellow Gold Aquamarine ...
    $425
    See all

    Comments

    1. Moonstonelover21 Moonstonelover21, 10 years ago
      This is an Art Deco etched ring. The stone is an emerald cushion cut. There are 3 stones that are missing from both shoulders of the shank. Classic of 1920-40's. Very nice
      Lee
    2. srwolson, 10 years ago
      Ooo, interesting! Thank you Lee!
    3. srwolson, 10 years ago
      Thanks valentino97! Lee, do you think the stones that were lost/taken out were the same type of cut as the main stone? Maybe baguette style? They would have been so tiny! Wondering if I should get it restored or just leave it as is. Thanks!
    4. twentiethcentury twentiethcentury, 9 years ago
      Just gorgeous! I think my eyes nearly popped out when I saw this.

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.