Share your favorites on Show & Tell

19th Century Militia NCO Sword

In Military and Wartime > Swords > Show & Tell.
Jewels's loves1353 of 5192British Made Aluminum Basin Arts and crafts Dorrie Nossiter jadeite drops/earrings.
7
Love it
0
Like it

ttomtuckerttomtucker loves this.
blunderbuss2blunderbuss2 loves this.
Alan2310Alan2310 loves this.
trunkmantrunkman loves this.
JewelsJewels loves this.
surfdub66surfdub66 loves this.
ho2cultchaho2cultcha loves this.
See 5 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 10 years ago

    Chrisnp
    (310 items)

    I suspect some may argue this is a fraternal, rather than NCO sword. I understand why – except for the US Shield, it would look just like those ubiquitous fraternal swords. American militias in the 19th century were often more social than practical, and the richer militias would purchase fancier equipment like this from catalogues – The same catalogues that were available to fraternal organizations, so I suspect there was a cross-over. Nonetheless, Bezdek’s “American Swords and Sword makers”, and Peterson’s “The American Sword” identify this style of sword as a “Militia Noncommissioned Officer’s Sword, 1850-1870.”

    I’m not prepared to claim this is an American Civil War era sword, but there is an interesting thread on Sword Forum International that discusses these swords, and it seems folks there generally agree that typically, earlier swords like this have wider crossguards, a separate ring below the grip, and thicker, wider, shorter blades. Post-Civil war swords have narrower crossguards, the lower ring cast as part of the guard, and thinner blades.

    At 4 ¾” width, the crossguard here would indicate the older wide manufacture, as would the separate ring below the bone grips. The brass seems to have traces of gilding. The grips themselves have noticeable variations in the vertical grooves, or “reeding” that I believe indicate hand cutting rather than machine production.

    The blade is at least 3/4” wide at the crossguard (The shields get in the way of accuracy) and is 25” long. Wider and shorter than many, but not proof in itself. The blade is elliptical in cross-section and etched with floral sprays and military trophies – another indicator since fraternal blades often carried the symbols of their rites rather than military trophies. Unfortunately without any maker marks, I there are limits to what this blade tells me.

    logo
    Swords
    See all
    US Army WW1 Cavalry Springfield Armory M-1913 Patton Saber & Scabbard Dated 1914
    US Army WW1 Cavalry Springfield Arm...
    $257
    Antique Japan Muromachi Shuriagi Katana Samurai Shinto, nihonto Japanees sword
    Antique Japan Muromachi Shuriagi Ka...
    $155
    Vintage Japanese Military 95 Type Sword Samurai Katana Signed Blade Brass Handle
    Vintage Japanese Military 95 Type S...
    $153
    WW2 JAPANESE OFFICERS ARMY SWORD & SCABBARD SIGNED AND DATED minty #2
    WW2 JAPANESE OFFICERS ARMY SWORD & ...
    $810
    logo
    US Army WW1 Cavalry Springfield Armory M-1913 Patton Saber & Scabbard Dated 1914
    US Army WW1 Cavalry Springfield Arm...
    $257
    See all

    Comments

    1. blunderbuss2 blunderbuss2, 10 years ago
      Took me a moment to figure what you meant by "ring". You are referring to a spacer?
    2. Chrisnp Chrisnp, 10 years ago
      yep, right above the guard and below the bone handle.
    3. Chrisnp Chrisnp, 10 years ago
      Thanks for the love ttomtucker, blunder, Alan2310, trunkman, CindB, Jewels, surfdub66, ho2cultcha and bratjdd

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.