CDV image of Twins!! | ||
| AmatoorPikr's loves900 of 1648 |  |  |
AnnaB loves this.
ttomtucker loves this.
jscott0363 loves this.
cpbigd loves this.
sanhardin loves this.
Ted_Straub loves this.
Radegunder loves this.
kivatinitz loves this.
MyFavoriteTreasures loves this.
fortapache loves this.
ho2cultcha loves this.
officialfuel loves this.
blunderbuss2 loves this.
racer4four loves this.
Rareclassyunique75 loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
SpiritBear loves this.
VioletOrange loves this.
sklo42 loves this.AmatoorPikr loves this.
antiquerose loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 9 years ago
scottvez
(977 items)
Not really!
This Civil War era carte de visite (cdv) actually shows an early form of trick photography.
The plate was double exposed and captured the subject in two different locations.
Photographed by Cremer's Portrait Rooms out of Philadelphia, PA.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
Gee..............I just would have thought maybe they were just *twins*. How can you tell that by these? That is Amazing !!!
It just jumps out to me. Two of the reasons-- the odd non- interaction between the "two" and the difference in light/ dark on "sides" of the image.
I have several of these and can post some more examples if interested.
scott
Expert eye there Scott! Very interesting.
Thanks-- appreciate your comment.
Here is another interesting double exposure image with a photographer with camera:
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/71700-photographer-with-his-camera
scott
Thanks cultcha and official!
scott
The only place I can possibly see a diff. in shadows is on the bowler (& I'm not so sure there !). And then, if they are using the same set, why would they change the angle of the lighting to a noticeable degree ? I think they are 3 meter tall giant aliens studying designs for crop-circles or designs they can plant that point toward Egyptians being the 1st to discover the Americas after the already present "Indians". LOL !!
Not sure what you are talking about-- difference in shadows, change of light angle or aliens...
scott
Scott, you're no fun tonite ! I was referring to your remark about, "---- the diff. in light/dark on "sides" of images ". Not referring to the angle of light & shadows ? If I have to explain my other comments, you need to take humour classes ! LOL !!
I want to see them as sextuplets.
I haven't seen anything beyond a "twin" image.
scott
Thanks for looking treasures.
scott
Just added photo #1 of another one of these "twin" or trick photos.
This example shows the disconnected "twins" again and probably better illustrates the dark/ light differences between the two exposures as they were not timed exactly the same.
Here is a link on the subject as well:
http://www.photographymuseum.com/seeingdouble.html
scott
Thanks for posting these interesting photos. Like you, I could tell from the first picture, there's a line right down the middle separating the two images.
very interesting
Thanks gillian and kiva!
scott
Thanks for looking tom!
scott
Thanks again ted!
scott
Thanks for looking sanhardin!
scott
Thanks tom.
scott
Thanks again cpbigd.
scott
Thanks jscott!
scott
Thanks again tom!
scott