Czech Art Deco Splatter/Tango Glass Basket | ||
| philmac51's loves1359 of 1531 |  |  |
Newfld loves this.
charcoal loves this.
IronLace loves this.
SEAN68 loves this.
fleafinder loves this.
Vintagefran loves this.
Mac63 loves this.
Michelleb007 loves this.
Rick55 loves this.
NevadaBlades loves this.
kivatinitz loves this.
Ivonne loves this.
IanBrighton loves this.
fortapache loves this.
blunderbuss2 loves this.
racer4four loves this.
philmac51 loves this.aura loves this.
mikelv85 loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
Manikin loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 8 years ago
sklo42
(897 items)
I have nothing against baskets apart from them taking up a lot of space. However I had to buy this one and I'm sure you can see why. The spatter is the same as that on the bowl except for the black veining. On the basket the black that makes it Tango is added via the handle.
In spite of my best efforts I cannot establish whether the handle is cobalt or amethyst.
Height 17 cm./6.75 inches Diameter 15 cm./6 jnches
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
The decors are remarkably similar, aren't they?
I think so Ian. Apart from the veining the lidded bowl has an additional orange inner layer. The basket doesn't have this and so there is clear glass visible between the spatters.
This is a great comparison to see. I agree that the basic spatters are the same and by the same house. There are simply a couple of additional steps in production that were used to produce the covered piece.
Thanks welzebub. jagsrock has a fine example of this décor on legs.
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/116374-kralik-egg-shaped-footed-candy-dish
sorry I hadn't commented. this confetti (uncased) with veining can be seen in both Kralik and Welz- possibly others too. Craigs example is clearly welz but the basket is Kralik. With the same materials and easy production process they were easy to copy