Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Estate find. Need help please!

In Furniture > Chairs > Show & Tell.
Chairs461 of 2951this is also a George humzingerLion face furniture
2
Love it
0
Like it

officialfuelofficialfuel loves this.
auraaura loves this.
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 6 years ago

    Awilmot
    (5 items)

    Hi! I’m Ashley and somewhat new to collecting antiques for my home/hobby. I found this chair at an estate sale this weekend and love it for a fun project. I’m curious to know more about it however. The front legs don’t seem to match the rest of the chair!? Am I correct? Also, I think this was a cane bottom at one point. Would it be possible to have re done? Curious at to age of the chair (with exception of front legs if they aren’t original). Thank you in advance for any knowledge you can lend a beginner??

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Chairs
    See all
    RARE 17TH C CT PILGRIM LADDERBACK ARMCHAIR TURNED ARMS IN OLD RED PAINT
    RARE 17TH C CT PILGRIM LADDERBACK A...
    $142
    Authentic SIGNED VTG Thonet Model 10 Bentwood Rocking Chair Rocker Cane Rattan
    Authentic SIGNED VTG Thonet Model 1...
    $300
    A RARE WILLIAM & MARY 18TH C CHELMSFORD MA BANNISTER BACK CHAIR IN OLD RED PAINT
    A RARE WILLIAM & MARY 18TH C CHELMS...
    $26
    A CLASSIC 18TH C CT TRACY SCHOOL WINDSOR FAN BACK CHAIR IN ORIGINAL RED PAINT
    A CLASSIC 18TH C CT TRACY SCHOOL WI...
    $112
    logo
    RARE 17TH C CT PILGRIM LADDERBACK ARMCHAIR TURNED ARMS IN OLD RED PAINT
    RARE 17TH C CT PILGRIM LADDERBACK A...
    $142
    See all

    Comments

    1. fhrjr2 fhrjr2, 6 years ago
      You pose an interesting question. Looking at picture #3 I would say the rear legs are not original. There is a raised button plug which is out of place with the rest of the chair and the bottoms of the rear legs show little to no wear while the opposite is true of the bottom of the front legs. Just my two bits.
    2. Awilmot Awilmot, 6 years ago
      Ah! Interesting. So, possibly that the the back of the chair isn’t the original part!? I’ve taken a few more pictures to see if that helps. Now that I look at it... the wood grain on the seat matches better with the front legs and not really with the back of the chair. Ha! How funny. Can you help me age either piece? I only paid about $2 for it so I’m truly excited either way! Thanks for your help!
    3. scottvez scottvez, 6 years ago
      I think it is all original. I have seen many similar examples where the front legs are turned and the back legs are not.

      The chair is typical of the type of chair that was produced in large numbers in the 1890s- 1920 and sold by everyone, to include a large amount through mail order catalogs.

      The cane seats aren't cheap to have them professional re- caned. Probably more costly than what the chair would be worth after the effort. I used to know some folks who did cane chairs, but they are no longer in business.

      Of course you can try and do the work yourself or just create some sort of cushion or patch.

      scott
    4. Awilmot Awilmot, 6 years ago
      Thanks so much y’all! I find just even knowing the time frame helpful. I had originally planned for this to be a planter chair for my garden but it’s so sturdy. I’m having a hard time bringing myself to put it outside. I agree that I probably won’t have it recaned but will try another type of seat for it. I have my great grandmother’s ladder back dinning chairs from the Brumby Company that were probably mail ordered through a catalog. They have the square leather lion seat still in them and are beautiful. So I’ll try to go with something creative like that. Y’all have been very helpful. Thanks so much!

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.