I have no idea..? | ||
| fortapache's loves24825 of 94705 |  |  |
Manikin loves this.
RichmondLori loves this.
fortapache loves this.
officialfuel loves this.
ho2cultcha loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
kwqd loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 4 years ago
Vintage_Joe
(132 items)
Looks old, chest has no: 16(description).
Arms are cut and missing. Toes are made from cardboard. I just like face painting.
How old, origin, is it model for...?
Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
Mani will know but it looks very interesting.
Your doll appears to be a fertility doll made by a tribe . Not sure which country doesn't look Asian or African but maybe a Mexican or Spanish look to it . It is a she and they made her be crudely anatomically correct . Dating her in late 1900s after 1950s is a guess . Very cool doll . Wish I could tell you more .
Surely it is a religious figure to dress, the arms are articulated at the elbow, they go together with wire or wood, to be able to hold the baby Jesus, I notice that the face is very roughly repainted, it is a possibly colonial figure.
Forget to say that hands and arm (which are missing) could be made of another material, for example papier-mâché
Thanks for answers, i'd like to think this is colonial piece but we never know.
Best