Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Tiffany mark

In Art Glass > Tiffany Art Glass > Show & Tell.
JJZ's loves64 of 76Early Quezal art glass vase, unsignedIs it Tiffany? Or Durand? Or Quezal?
4
Love it
0
Like it

inkyinky loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
JJZJJZ loves this.
dasullywondasullywon loves this.
See 2 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 12 years ago

    Curiouscol…
    (2 items)

    This is the mark on the bottom of the green vase whose photo I posted a couple weeks ago. I apologize for the somewhat out-of-focus photo - it is the best I can do for now. Have you seen other Tiffany pieces marked like this?

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Tiffany Art Glass
    See all
    Large Antique RARE A.D. NASH Gold Favrile Chevron Art Glass Vase Tiffany Partner
    Large Antique RARE A.D. NASH Gold F...
    $530
    RARE Antique L.C.T. Tiffany Blue Favrile Hand Blown Iridescent Art Glass Bowl NR
    RARE Antique L.C.T. Tiffany Blue Fa...
    $227
    Tiffany Stained Glass Handcrafted Corded Electric Style Turtle Table Lamp
    Tiffany Stained Glass Handcrafted C...
    $11
    Rare antique Tiffany / Loetz iridescent hand-blown pulled feather Shade Mint
    Rare antique Tiffany / Loetz irides...
    $95
    logo
    Large Antique RARE A.D. NASH Gold Favrile Chevron Art Glass Vase Tiffany Partner
    Large Antique RARE A.D. NASH Gold F...
    $530
    See all

    Comments

    1. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 12 years ago
      that is an early tiffany mark but from what I understand that mark was used before nash was in the studio. I'd think that style of glass would have been later than the mark, but WDIK about Tiffany.. Not a ton : )
    2. dasullywon dasullywon, 12 years ago
      Yes, if it's Tiffany it looks like a Nash-era item, so I agree with your dilemma GSO. When I first saw the original posting I though "maybe early Tiffany" so...I also thought Trevaise, but that mark would say no. If someone was going to fake a Tiffany signature they almost certainly wouldn't use that one. That's what little I know :)
    3. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 12 years ago
      I have one with that mark too.
      http://www.thegildedcurio.com/item-701.html

      no idea what to make of mine. that's the only reason I had any knowledge of the mark. Reyne said pretty sure it's not actually tiffany.. so it appears someone did use this as a fake mark. Mine has all the hall marks of actually being old though. not sure who did make it.
    4. JJZ JJZ, 12 years ago
      Curiouscollects, The signature, that's what I have been waiting to see and what I suspected from the beginning...with this signature you have a very nice and rare early art glass vase. It is believed to be made by the TIFFANY GLASS COMPANY, circa 1893.
    5. Curiouscollects, 12 years ago
      Thank you for your remarks, everyone. I am inclined to favor JJZ's post, naturally. Can someone direct me to a book or a museum collection that has a similar object for comparison?
    6. LoetzBuddies LoetzBuddies, 12 years ago
      I AGREE WITH THE MASTER JJZ........IT'S TIFFANY. I HAVE A VERY SIMILAR TREVAISE VASE WITHOUT THE ROLLED GOLD TOP WHICH TREVAISE NEVER DID. TREVAISE WAS MADE IN 1907 SO THEY ALL LOOK LIKE EARLY TIFFANY. I POSTED MY TREVAISE EARLIER UNDER AMERICAN ART GLASS.
    7. JJZ JJZ, 12 years ago
      Curiouscollects, The Charles Hosmer MORSE MUSEUM of American Art, Winter Park, Florida has one of the most extensive Louis C. Tiffany collections in existence. They have several TIFFANY GLASS COMPANY examples in their permanent collection. FYI: "The TIFFANY GLASS COMPANY was established in Corona, New York on December 1, 1885. They changed the glasshouse's name to the TIFFANY GLASS AND DECORATING COMPANY in 1892". I hope this helps.
    8. Greatsnowyowl Greatsnowyowl, 12 years ago
      trevaise was the nash period though. the very early one's bearing this mark were before he was with the company so I've heard it's quite different from the trevaise nash look? 1907 is quite a bit later than when this mark was used, which would have been 1893-1895 right?

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.