Daum or Legras Cameo Glass Vase ? | ||
| Mac63's loves1150 of 1542 |  |  |
Beyermann loves this.
aura loves this.
Aimathena loves this.
musikchoo loves this.
Mac63 loves this.
beyemvey loves this.
ho2cultcha loves this.
AmberRose loves this.
Slave-to-glass loves this.
Greatsnowyowl loves this.
inky loves this.
bkirks loves this.
blunderbuss2 loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
nldionne loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 12 years ago
Nootch
(38 items)
Hello: This is a very heavy cameo glass vase. It is 11" tall. It is not signed, but my guess is Daum or Legras. Polished pontil. Any inputs? Regards.
Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
Beautiful!
Hmm I don't think its a Daum, but its a very nice piece
As far as I know Daum signed everything, so this is most likely not Daum. The style is very Legras, and some of them were signed with a very small "Leg." signature? Very nice vase!
didn't daum sometimes sign on the base with gilding. it seems like that could easily wash off?
Isn't that also true of Legras? I think they used a silver stamp that would sometimes wear off. It looks more like Legras in the execution to me. Lovely vase!
Not arguing either way for attribution. These pics just aren't detailed enough for me to even begin to make judgement on execution.
Legras seems more likely than Daum just because Legras is more common to find. (for Legras was not always signed. but they definitely had methods of signing that could wash off. I will say that the way the glass appears to be finished on the bottom doesn't seem very legras like.
My comment was just meant to be a counter point to the Daum Always signed angle.
I do suspect this piece is cut down.. but again too fuzzy to tell for sure.
Scuse the bad punctuation, it looks like I got distracted from a thought in the middle there. the "(for" is there by accident :)