Share your favorites on Show & Tell

From Hong Kong

In Asian > Asian Vases > Show & Tell.
Deepseas72's loves301 of 361Is my punch bowl American Brilliant Cut Glass? Any thoughts as to patterns and age?SCHEIBE-ALSBACH Napoleon figurine
9
Love it
0
Like it

DeanoDeano loves this.
mikelv85mikelv85 loves this.
auraaura loves this.
SEAN68SEAN68 loves this.
Deepseas72Deepseas72 loves this.
kyratangokyratango loves this.
surfdub66surfdub66 loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
aghcollectaghcollect loves this.
See 7 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 10 years ago

    Deepseas72
    (160 items)

    Hand painted with butterflies, dragons, and coins. Dealer said it was from the 1860's. It is 12.5 inches tall. The dealer wrote some information on the card, but I have been unable to verify it on the Internet.

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Asian Vases
    See all
    RARE BLUE AND WHITE PORCELAIN FLOWER VASE OF CHINESE ANTIQUE
    RARE BLUE AND WHITE PORCELAIN FLOWE...
    $20
    FINE! LARGE Antique Chinese Blue and White Porcelain Yen Yen Vase 18th C QING
    FINE! LARGE Antique Chinese Blue an...
    $189
    Estate Collection Lg PAIR Antique Chinese Sang de Boeuf Glaze Famille Rose Vases
    Estate Collection Lg PAIR Antique C...
    $661
    LARGE Antique Chinese Blue and White Dragon Jar Wooden Stand & Cover QING 19th C
    LARGE Antique Chinese Blue and Whit...
    $325
    logo
    RARE BLUE AND WHITE PORCELAIN FLOWER VASE OF CHINESE ANTIQUE
    RARE BLUE AND WHITE PORCELAIN FLOWE...
    $20
    See all

    Comments

    1. Asia1 Asia1, 10 years ago
      The vase is modern, the decoration is clearly printed/stamped, the foot obviously modern, and the dealers sticker attributing the vase to be antique is unfortunately wrong, the vase is circa 1970...
    2. shrine shrine, 10 years ago
      OMG, this one is superb. It's clearly not printed but hand painted. A printed one can't make the paint thicker in one place than the others. The sticker says it's from TongChih/Tongzhi period not Xianfeng. Xiangfeng period is comparatively short and one with that mark is rare.
    3. surfdub66 surfdub66, 10 years ago
      Stunning vase !!
      Cant say if printed or not from pictures , some were transfer painted (transfer then hand coloured) from 19c or earlier . This one looks good to me !! My opinion only ;-)
    4. wma, 5 years ago
      All the decorations are stamped.
    5. apostata apostata, 2 years ago
      x insert( Van Oort exemption)
    6. apostata apostata, 2 years ago
      there are some types of mocca and luster
      i looked for Prof van Oort interbellum stuff ( republic), look if i could find this mark as used in de coral glaze pieces ( same tonality of the mark) but complete different

      combinations ruyihead -pending i have , not befote 1930 in red, and the mark is written in an bogus way

      IMO this is not painted, not stencilled , not pigmentspraym nothing wrong as long as you as long as you don,t get splashing or spraying, strange type of a sort of rococo ruyi heads in combination with an pending jewel design

      surprising pending jewel design is and the ruyiheads are in the middle!!

      a carefully made exciting frivolous vase , probably not painted , the marks sucks but who cares no one sees it likely 1950-1960

      actually i think you done real well

    7. apostata apostata, 2 years ago
      correction pending jewel + ruyi , stamped or an strip application, hard to say
    8. apostata apostata, 2 years ago
      do something kid we have to known if this is an oort exemption , you have to known we are not talking chicken shit here

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.