Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Meiping vase marked Ming but I doubt it

In Asian > Chinese Pottery > Show & Tell and Pottery > Show & Tell.
Asian Antiques5182 of 10501Asian Carved wooden male figure Please help me ID this piece.Red and White Glaze Mystery Mark Snuff Bottle
3
Love it
0
Like it

ho2cultchaho2cultcha loves this.
LovelyPatLovelyPat loves this.
auraaura loves this.
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 8 years ago

    Offcenter
    (1 item)

    From an estate sale in Houston. No information available. Marked Ming, Wanli reign but I know that doesn't mean it's so. About a foot tall. A free oral appraisal put the value at about $3,000 three or four years ago. Later another guy said it was worth less than $200. Anybody got any ideas. I haven't found another one like it anywhere. I'd call it nice pottery not porcelain. I mainly want to know its approximate age and where it was made. Would appreciate any help I can get.

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Chinese Pottery
    See all
    Chinese Antique Porcelain Cup Famille Rose Qing Dynasty 19th Century Seal Mark
    Chinese Antique Porcelain Cup Famil...
    $257
    Antique Chinese 18th/19thC Famille Verte Biscuit Magpie Rouleau Vase Pair Kangxi
    Antique Chinese 18th/19thC Famille ...
    $64
    14thC Antique Yuan Dynasty Chinese Blue & Porcelain Handled Flask Vase, NR
    14thC Antique Yuan Dynasty Chinese ...
    $135
    16thC Antique Chinese Porcelain Ming Dynasty JiaJing Mark Dragon Phoenix Plate
    16thC Antique Chinese Porcelain Min...
    $88
    logo
    Chinese Antique Porcelain Cup Famille Rose Qing Dynasty 19th Century Seal Mark
    Chinese Antique Porcelain Cup Famil...
    $257
    See all

    Comments

    1. apostata apostata, 4 years ago
      actually i thought i could read chinese , well thats that seems to be megalomany of mine apparently , because this is hard to read ,

      a sort of Chongzhen 1628-1643 ( long shot ) even when it might be real , i think there is almost no market for this , i don,t think it is much value
    2. apostata apostata, 3 months ago
      they stilized it wrong , it is ineed wanli, i ran the bottom and the sedimentation is is total bogus

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.