Canadian 1953 - .50 cent piece | ||
| Rick55's loves1107 of 7949 |  |  |
sherrilou loves this.
Reise loves this.
Drake47 loves this.
GianaMZ loves this.
vcal loves this.
MALKEY loves this.
Radegunder loves this.
Newfld loves this.
Rick55 loves this.
vintagelamp loves this.
fortapache loves this.
Manikin loves this.
DecoVoo loves this.
beyemvey loves this.
JImam loves this.
jscott0363 loves this.
bijoucaillouvintage loves this.
mikelv85 loves this.
PhilDMorris loves this.
Efesgirl loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
TassieDevil loves this.Caperkid loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 8 years ago
antiquerose
(1467 items)
Hi CW Gang ~
Have this from my Dad coins ( + RIP + ) and it is 1953 Canadian .50 cent piece. I know they talk about the Shoulder strap on this year and that it depends which it has // or has not == as one is worth some $$$, I think. Just thought I would post it. So does this HAVE the shoulder strap or not? Let me know your thoughts.
Any additional info welcomed.....
Thanks for LOOKING // LOVING !!
~ Rose ~
==================
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
Maybe this page info will help. There is a coin forum.
http://www.coincommunity.com/canadian_fifty_cents/1953_elizabeth_ii_fifty_cent.asp
I can,t see it dear IMO 1953 Canada 50 Cents Km# 53 Shoulder Fold, first portrait
there is lot of wear, its awfull hard to see, For the 1953 production year, there were two obverse varieties (No Shoulder Fold and Shoulder Fold) and two reverse varieties (Small Date and Large Date). Because of die polishing, a variant exists in 1953 and 1954 coins where the shoulder strap cannot be easily seen.
you still got the curvilinearity in the shoulder bowl, see the comparison , NUmista
50 Cents - Elizabeth II 1st portrait, simplified coat of arms
we have to grade the state were it is , i think it is VG which means VERY GOOD or in the best case scenario FINE IMO you are in a VG 10 grading which actually are the lowest qualification
the intrinsic valua is from 0$ - 7 dollar, the market value is certainly not much higher
sorry dear i can,t see it , so i am not sure, this is the best i can do