Chinese Bowl with Three Red Dragons | ||
| katherinesco…'s loves114 of 8240 |  |  |
vcal loves this.
katherinescollections loves this.
apostata loves this.
SEAN68 loves this.
slotman loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
aura loves this.
AdeleC loves this.
hunterqlee loves this.
Newfld loves this.
fortapache loves this.
ho2cultcha loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 6 years ago
ho2cultcha
(5051 items)
This bowl is very thin and lightweight. it has 3 dragons on it and each has 5 claws on each foot. It's signed with the typical Jingdezhen mark. Not sure of age though.
Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
could i get a picture of the inner bowl
to difficult for me , and the lack of information did,not help either
it is signed qianlong , which makes it more difficult to date mostly this type of bowls are signed guanghu
this are the questions
1 is it possible to syncronise this mark with with an multicolore dragon during the qianlong periode ( no it,s not ( only yellow green with a denser glazing)
2 what about the , actually quite delicate it is not made the easy way out ( see 5 pronged left under instead of the lazy 3 prong)
3 there is an difference of fluidum in the mark ( tony Allen sees this as an benefit , compared the one stroking of an symbol)
4 crosshatch and dots missing on the belly of the dragon ( also an theory of tony allen i believe) defines Guanghu, in this not so significant because the dragon is red there is no use for emphasing)
5 why is the orange so diluded , just style could be guanghu , there are different qualities
6 an silly question HOW WHITE IS WHITE ( Anthony Lee Asian art reseach)
the white porcelain ground was used for white The use of white enamels on porcelain came generally late to post Qing Dijnasty and predomniantly on export wares
i am inclined to think this is probably early Republic ot ( les likely late Guanghu )
2 addendum what about the mark
the brown rim is also missing