Posted 5 years ago
Sandygal
(16 items)
Hello! You have all been so helpful in the past...I know you’ll come through! Wondering what the symbols on the bottom are, and what age the bowl has. I love it! It’s in beautiful condition. Thanks!
Japanese bowl..curious of era | ||
| Recent comments268 of 180016 |  |  |
i got serious doubts here , the probably try to imitate a type of nabeshima ware
i know this type of pieces as hinrode tsuru , clouded sunrise ( without sun here)
The burgundy tentacles are kasumi design which means spring mist design and they are mid edo related lets say around around 1770
i cant read the mark , which is unknown to me but the garands on the back are completety of , IMO it is 20 century
Could it be marked Kakutomi?
japanese porcelain , actually IMO this is a valuable contribution of you , because i don,t know kakutomi only ethymological ( in which i am very poor) and this is an awfull lot of work for nickle and dime stuff
well lets give it a try in pinyin we got a sort of symbol expressing financiel asset , co-meaning is plethora or affluence, other co meaning = opulence
well lets convert this this in kangi , than you got the FUKI meaning which is an equivalentof the kangi word TOMI
maybe thats a soltution i don,t some sort of free interpretation of LORD BOWLES of 1882 , i don,t know
maybe we could convert it bij shape , this is an rectancular , then you got KAKU ( kanji), actually you got your KAKU - AO ( KAKU - BLUE !!)
your contribution is of importantance , because technically it is not AOKI ( probably ) but the got a lot of freestyling ( butt mark still remains rectangular and it is so called single or double framed in AO, which is mostly related to MEIJJI period
other remark about dating , the so called reverse garlands sloppy florals, which i thought it was mostly TAISHO PERIOD , well thats is a BLUNDER of me ! because they also appear earlier, i just did, not knew
how about the red mark ( insuffient sampling source OLD IMARI (???? ) and Antique Imari ( but insuffient sampling) and this is not SOMENISHIKI =white ground and not simultaneus enanaling of the colours
take care this is not ferro red , and this not the red of bordering signing of cargo batching
try to pinpoint this on KAKIHAN = personlanalized seal painted signature , well i can,t read it , well can,t tell , because not skilled enough
so actually my former assesment was probably superficial ( i make numerals BLUNDERS)
personally i think this is rather sound , we got some consistency now
ty for your precious contribution,
WAKI (can i sleep now ty)
( addendum) whats is it bij design , some sort of 5 color - brocade, asked the experts, because i go to sleep - end of story