Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Constantinople 1277 Hijri

In World Coins > Show & Tell.
World Coins0 of 0
7
Love it
0
Like it

fortapachefortapache loves this.
blunderbuss2blunderbuss2 loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
auraaura loves this.
IVAN49IVAN49 loves this.
kwqdkwqd loves this.
mrsaikalymrsaikaly loves this.
See 5 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 3 years ago

    mrsaikaly
    (3 items)

    this coin has a title Constantinople year 1277 Hijri.
    it is a very lovely coin and in a good shape as shown in the image. the 1277 Hijri is related to year 1860,1861.
    when you look at this coin date, you look at it and notice how important this coin was during that period of time.

    logo
    World Coins
    See all
    Beautiful 2 Reichspfennig Nazi Coin: Genuine Bronze Third Reich Germany WW2-era
    Beautiful 2 Reichspfennig Nazi Coin...
    $7
    Beautiful Bronze Nazi Coin: Genuine 1 Reichspfennig Third Reich Germany WW2-era
    Beautiful Bronze Nazi Coin: Genuine...
    $6
    WW2 Authentic Rare German Coins and Unused Stamps World War 2 Artifacts
    WW2 Authentic Rare German Coins and...
    $28
    Rare WW2 German Coins Set with Secure Display Case Historical WW2 Artifacts
    Rare WW2 German Coins Set with Secu...
    $27
    logo
    Beautiful 2 Reichspfennig Nazi Coin: Genuine Bronze Third Reich Germany WW2-era
    Beautiful 2 Reichspfennig Nazi Coin...
    $7
    See all

    Comments

    1. IVAN49 IVAN49, 3 years ago
      10 Para
      Sultan Abdülaziz (1861-1876)
      1277 (1864)


    2. keramikos, 3 years ago
      mrsaikaly, Cool. :-)

      As IVAN49 wrote, it's a coin from the reign of Sultan Abdülaziz:

      http://www.theottomans.org/english/family/abdulaziz.asp

      Sultan Abdülaziz seems to have led a bit of a checkered life:

      https://www.britannica.com/biography/Abdulaziz-Ottoman-sultan

      IVAN49, I'm looking at both the ten and twenty Para coins, and the obverse of the coin in this post looks to me more like the twenty:

      https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces15177.html

      https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces5066.html

      Is it possible that the reverse is worn/damaged just enough to make the denomination look more like ten?
    3. mrsaikaly mrsaikaly, 3 years ago
      I added a closer image for it. IT Seems to me a 20 para as you stated rather than a 10.
      Thank you for these lovely information.
    4. keramikos, 3 years ago
      Hi again, mrsaikaly. :-)

      Thank you for the added close-up photograph of the center of the reverse side of your coin.

      It doesn't look like wear or damage to the denomination character makes interpreting it difficult.

      When I looked closer at the ten and twenty Para coins at numista, it seems to me that there is less space between the bottom of the ten character, and the little square than there is between the bottom of the twenty character and the little square.

      I found another Turkish ten Para coin. Actually, a proof:

      https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/turkey-10-para-km-700-1277-4-cuid-1101714-duid-1549968

      You can see that it's unambiguously a 10 Para, yet the obverse side looks like the twenty Para coin at numista.

      Why the obverse side of the ten Para coin at numista has so many more characters on it, I don't know.

      It would take somebody with much more knowledge than I have to explain.

      However, I do think that your coin is a ten Para.
    5. IVAN49 IVAN49, 3 years ago
      20 para is heavier: 10.65 g
      10 para weight is 5.2 g.
    6. keramikos, 3 years ago
      IVAN49, Yes, the twenty Para coin is larger than the ten Para coin, both in weight and diameter, which seems sensible.

      However, what mystified me was the differences in the obverse design between two coins of the same denomination, and Islamic/Hijri year.

      I found another ten Para coin at Numista, and it has the same obverse design as the one in this post:

      https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces22605.html

      The Islamic/Hijri year is 1277 again, but the Western year is 1864 (instead of 1861).

      Also, this coin is "Year 4," whereas the other ten Para coin is "Year 1."

      They must have tweaked the design between Year 1 and Year 4 besides just changing the year.

      Overall, I think this coin is more like the one in this post.

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.