Posted 12 years ago
ericevans2
(52 items)
Rob's Panoramic Cameras reminded me of this humbler version that Kodak produced; you don't need to be a collector to see that it is not quite as it left the factory; let me tell you a story. This camera came to me free of charge; nobody would have paid one cent for it. It was a poor broken orphan of a thing, supposedly covered in leather except that 75% at least of the leather was missing and the other 25% was in tatters. But the wood underneath looked good, (like mahogany to me), and because it was a well-meant gift from someone who knew I collected cameras, I decided it had to live. So I stripped it to the bare wood and polished it, and replaced the front cover which was absent. Well, I think it looks good, anyway, although a Kodak collector would probably accuse me of sacrilege, even if the only alternative was the tip. I call it the only "Tropical Panoram" in existence. Just my bit of fun, but the serious question is, why would anybody carefully craft a camera out of such beautiful wood and then stick black leather all over it, in the first place?
Thanks mustangtony!
Thanks pops52!
Thanks BELLIN68!
It makes you wonder if Kodak should have created a tropical model ... looks good ... nice work!
Also forgot to comment that you can run 120 film through the camera; I've done it with a No.1 and it works pretty good.
Thanks, Rob. I think it shows the dedication of that era to quality; they could just as easily have used pine, or old orange crates.
Thanks chrissylovescats!
Thanks officialfuel!
Thanks miKKochristmas11!
Thanks petey!
Thanks Longings!
Thanks mtg75!
Thanks Antigue Toys!