Posted 10 years ago
eve14
(11 items)
beautiful vase
came from the same collector as the rest of my asian things
i would love some help on what, wehere, how? :)
thank you everybody
asian vase | ||
Asian Vases690 of 1097 |
Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 10 years ago
eve14
(11 items)
beautiful vase
came from the same collector as the rest of my asian things
i would love some help on what, wehere, how? :)
thank you everybody
Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
can anyone make out the mark on this one?
Gothenberg chinese mark no 572.
KANGXI NIAN ZHI- "Kangxi period make" c1900-1910
Its a beautiful vase ;-))
KANGXI NIAN ZHI- "Kangxi period make" c1661 to 1722
Made around middle 20c
shrine
so it a new one with old mark
like fake right?
surfdub66 and shrine have a bit of conflicting years on this one
?
eve14, Chinese starting faking hundreds years ago, some quality fakes with certain age are worth of collecting. middle 20c doesn't mean 'new'.
Chinese marks are a nightmare sometimes to I'd , a lot of the newer pottery were marked not always to be faked but as a respect for the ancients !
The dates I had were on the gothenberg chinese 20c marks.. no.572.
Anyone can go on this website its very handy if you collect oriental pottery ..
I have a small lidded pot listed with a dragon on the lid which has marks for 1522-1566 but was made sometime in the 20c , its a very good one that has confused a lot of experienced collectors & museums ..
The Kangxi Nian Zhi period is c1661-1722 your mark is c1900-1910 going by gothenbergs. If ! its a later one...
the only way to really tell if original or not is to take it to an oriental specialist ...
surfdub66,
i try to look at marks on the site after a couple of min i get dissy,lol
all of this is totally facinating to me,i had no intent of collecting asian things till i found the dragon temple jar and now it is a
i must posess.haha
It comes to us all im afraid !! ;-) lol
i wonder if we can still define this as Late Republic , could be PROC periodprobably