Share your favorites on Show & Tell
Post an item or

Pretty plate - anyone know the kiln?

In Asian > Chinese Plates > Show & Tell.
Chinese Plates145 of 233Very Old Chinese? Blue And White Plate With Flowers and FruitMore info on Dragon plate
6
Love it
0
Like it

auraaura loves this.
antiqueroseantiquerose loves this.
lzenglishlzenglish loves this.
surfdub66surfdub66 loves this.
aghcollectaghcollect loves this.
See 4 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 10 years ago

    Share

    Lei
    (8 items)

    It is small - a few inches across. Lovely.
    Do not know history. Would like help identifying and translating mark.
    Thank you.....

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Chinese Plates
    See all
    UNUSUAL ANTIQUE CHINESE BLUE & WHITE DRAGON GLAZED DISH PLATE EARLY MING DESIGN
    UNUSUAL ANTIQUE CHINESE BLUE & WHIT...
    $1,275
    VERY RARE 18THC CHINESE GUAN BLUE CRACKLE GLAZED PORCELAIN DISH PLAQUE QIANLONG
    VERY RARE 18THC CHINESE GUAN BLUE C...
    $1,025
    RARE CHINESE IMPERIAL XUANTONG MARK & PERIOD YELLOW GLAZED DRAGON DISH
    RARE CHINESE IMPERIAL XUANTONG MARK...
    $118
    A Very Rare Chinese Qing 17th C. Kangxi Period B&W
    A Very Rare Chinese Qing 17th C. Ka...
    $155
    logo
    UNUSUAL ANTIQUE CHINESE BLUE & WHITE DRAGON GLAZED DISH PLATE EARLY MING DESIGN
    UNUSUAL ANTIQUE CHINESE BLUE & WHIT...
    $1,275
    See all

    Comments

    1. noob, 10 years ago
      Just says 'Da Qing Qianlong Nian Zhi' ('Great Qing Qianlong period make'). It's not to be taken seriously, so unfortunately it doesn't help to identify the kiln or where the plate was decorated.
    2. Lei, 10 years ago
      Ok - why not to be taken seriously? It looks fairly new or if not new, in excellent condition. I thought it was Japanese.
    3. noob, 10 years ago
      The Qianlong emperor's reign was 1735 to 1796, and as you said, the dish does not pass for being 220 years old. It has just always been common for Chinese porcelain marks to refer to old emperors, and so it's not taken seriously when the piece is obviously not ancient.
    4. Lei, 10 years ago
      Yes, I guess it is a VERY GOOD counterfeit.
    5. noob, 10 years ago
      In this case, I wouldn't say 'counterfeit', as it was never meant to deceive. I'm pretty sure the manufacturer and the retailers weren't pricing the dish as if it were really a 200-year-old antique.

      It's the same as Keebler cookies not being counterfeit elf goods, despite Keebler ads claiming the cookies are made by elves. The claim was never meant to be believed.

      This case is also different from that of knock-off designer goods made cheaply in China. Hermes and Gucci and all the rest have brands, trademarks and designs to protect from knock-offs. The Qianlong emperor does not.

      All that said, there are fake antiques seriously meant to deceive out there. This just isn't one of them.
    6. Lei, 10 years ago
      I understand the Chinese believed it to be a compliment to copy previously made items.
      Thank you for your thoughts.....
    7. apostata apostata, 4 years ago
      actually this not bad , its missing the black dull guanghxu glazing, so it is a bit later , the garlands are good and the ferro red , actually its a quite well early republic

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.