Share your favorites on Show & Tell

Pair of Baseball Tintypes/Ambrotypes (Tucker Brothers from 1872 Pepperell, MA Ball Club)

In Baseball > Baseball Photos > Show & Tell and Photographs > Tintypes > Show & Tell.
Borninthewro…'s loves6 of 12Airfix Supermarine Spitfire Mk IX 1944 (75th Anniversary of D Day post)Bearded and Balloon trouser Mickeys
15
Love it
0
Like it

vcalvcal loves this.
Licorice1977Licorice1977 loves this.
ho2cultchaho2cultcha loves this.
tintypertintyper loves this.
FoundaroundtownFoundaroundtown loves this.
HunterHunter loves this.
rniedermanrniederman loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
purvispurvis loves this.
verbatimverbatim loves this.
NewfldNewfld loves this.
yougottahavestuffyougottahavestuff loves this.
fortapachefortapache loves this.
pw-collectorpw-collector loves this.
See 13 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 5 years ago

    rickzog4
    (57 items)

    These are rare baseball tintypes of two young men on the Pepperell, MA baseball club in 1872. They were originally in the frame shown in the last picture, stating their names and ages at the bottom. The backs of the photos also have a piece of tape with their information on them. They are from a 1/6 plate, which puts their dimensions at about the size of a baseball card. To be exact 2 3/8" X 3 7/8" for these two.

    Charles Tucker
    About 21 Yrs.
    Pep. Baseball Club
    1872

    Clarence Tucker
    About 19 Yrs.
    1st Baseman
    Pep. Ball Club

    I looked for more information on these two brothers and found on ancestry.com that Clarence lived from 1853-1954, which shows that he was indeed 19 years old during the time the photo was taken. And amazingly enough, he lived to be 100 years old. Charles was born in 1851, which shows he would have been 21 in the picture, as the frame suggests. They are on the same family tree in what I found online, showing them as brothers.

    Now, to speak to their eye-appeal and rarity compared to other baseball tintypes. I was drawn to these because, for one, they are brothers, with a name to put with each face. Most baseball tintypes are lost to history as far as a backstory. The uniforms are extremely slick for the day and don't look like the clown uniforms many players wore during the time period. Also, they are posed with a blank background, as opposed to some of the gaudy and strangely staged backgrounds you see in many other tintypes. Some had very intricately painted backdrops. I prefer the blank backdrop so the player can be seen better. This makes them seem more like baseball cards as well. They don't look out of place in their baseball uniforms, as many did during the time period (see my point about clown uniforms). These two look like they can actually play the game. They are truly beautiful baseball tintypes.

    Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

    logo
    Baseball Photos
    See all
    Pete Rose Signed Sliding 8x10 Baseball Photo (JSA)
    Pete Rose Signed Sliding 8x10 Baseb...
    $105
    Padres Fernando Tatis Jr. Signed 16x20 Photo Bat Flip Beckett BAS Witnessed
    Padres Fernando Tatis Jr. Signed 16...
    $98
    Dwight Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, Mike Tyson Signed 16x20 Pose 1 Color Photo (JS
    Dwight Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, M...
    $180
    Atlanta Braves Greats Sheffield, Murphy, Jones, Justice Signed Multi-Inscription
    Atlanta Braves Greats Sheffield, Mu...
    $116
    logo
    Pete Rose Signed Sliding 8x10 Baseball Photo (JSA)
    Pete Rose Signed Sliding 8x10 Baseb...
    $105
    See all

    Comments

    1. vetraio50 vetraio50, 5 years ago
      Great Images !!!!
    2. rniederman rniederman, 5 years ago
      Very nice images. And if you look closely, the brothers are leaning on a studio posing stand. You can see the base of the stand behind their legs and a bit of the vertical post. These typically had a head rest. This means the exposure was a couple seconds long.

      FWIW, the tintypes were probably shot on what is known as a multiplying studio camera (some had multiple lenses … some had shifting backs … some had both). This type of camera is capable of making numerous small format images on a single plate. A masks and/or septum inside the camera created the desired picture format and kept the images from overlapping. It was very cost effective. After development, the images were cut apart. Here is one of my posts that shows the kind of studio camera capable of making these types of tintypes: https://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/17740-1860s-american-multiplying-wet-plate-c

      Your tintypes are slightly larger than the 1/6-plate standard (2-3/4 x 3-1/4). For example, a whole-plate format (6-1/2 x 8-1/2) camera with four lenses could produce these images.
    3. scottvez scottvez, 5 years ago
      Great images-- 19th century baseball images are hard to find, especially hard images.

      Great info on the camera rob. The size of image is also indicative of a post Civil War product (taller and thinner than a true sixth plate) and were often just put into albums as a cheaper alternative to the earlier cased images.

      scott
    4. rickzog4 rickzog4, 5 years ago
      Thanks all.

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.