Posted 5 years ago
Tammy1986
(1 item)
Inherented, know it's atleast 100 years old.
Want to know more about it.
Age/ worth/ care....... .
Does anyone know anything about this Case? | ||
| Asian Vases110 of 1097 |  |  |
Does anyone know anything about this Case? | ||
| Asian Vases110 of 1097 | | |
ho2cultcha loves this.
kwqd loves this.
blunderbuss2 loves this.
fortapache loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
aura loves this.
billretirecoll loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 5 years ago
Tammy1986
(1 item)
Inherented, know it's atleast 100 years old.
Want to know more about it.
Age/ worth/ care....... .
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
Hi Tammy, and Welcome to CW! :^) I think that it's a antique Famille Rose vase, but don't know much about them, except if real, can be valuable, if the right type! Try searching for it, to see what they are, but someone will know about them, on CW! Good Luck! :^)
Here's some that are on CW that you can check out for a start, and maybe someone that commented on the other posts can help you!
https://www.collectorsweekly.com/search.php?q=antique%20famille%20rose%20vase
Good Searching! :^)
This is what you could hope for, but not likely! :^D
https://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/art/forgotten-18th-century-chinese-vase-found-in-shoebox-sells-for-dh70-2-million-1.739415
The mark in red is a Qianlong seal mark, but I’m afraid the shape and decoration are not convincing.
There seems to be more white ground in the pictorial section than one usually expects, and the decoration bordering the pictorial section from the neck and from the base somehow seem ‘insubstantial’, less elaborated than usual.
If we could see clear, close-up detail of the decoration on the neck, we should be able to see what quality effort went into this.
(I would guess 20th century.)
Some of the best Chinese porcelains were made in the Republic period 1912-1949. the fretwork looks pretty good on this but without good sharp photos of the entire base, we cannot tell you much.
well everybody is right, and Noob is very awoke because he saw the qianlong influences
in the early republic they faked qianlong , see scrolling lotus design in combition with the pointillism in the green above the rocks
its easy to see its early republic because the dark green ain,t right
i cant talk value its forbidden
sorry i have to intrude i need to explain this for a friend
we explained the kaishu script and now web try to explain zuanshu script
Take a chart Ching Dynasty marks left rows
10 reigns 60 symbols
here 6 characters from left to write
left 1 top row no signifance top row right non significant
bottom row left not signifant, bottom row right non significant, why because they are all the same
so only the mid section is important,
actually we have to remind yongzheng , qianlong tonzhi for praktical reason, otherwise you try the mid section for instance for an seldom daogung
as an bonus we forget kangxi they appear mostly kaishu script as a 4 dot , and if you encounter itzuanshu script is complete bull s,,,, its a recent macao invention
so we take it the easy way out yongzheng qianlong and tongzhi, not even guanghu because it appears almost always the kaishu script
remember it is only the mid section what matters
So we got in Yongzheng an major F type of symbol so it is yongzheng of course it is fake but you got the mark, well it is easy you only search for the capital F
qianlong take the mid one under three beads at a tape , i always call it an meerkat in dutch i don,t know the english word
tongzhi in this case we take the smiling open mouth is always the indicator even when it is an 4 character , the trouble is almost always an fake recent macao made mark
bit chaotic , but i am sure by frequency you covered the very most