Two Small Japanese Plates | ||
| Pottery, Ceramics etc121 of 313 |  |  |
rancherswife loves this.
SEAN68 loves this.
jscott0363 loves this.
kwqd loves this.
Cisum loves this.
aura loves this.
Debs4 loves this.
Alfie21 loves this.
Newfld loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.
vcal loves this.
fortapache loves this.
racer4four loves this.
dav2no1 loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 3 years ago
ho2cultcha
(5051 items)
I think that these are early transfer ware pieces from Japan - turn of the 20th c. Very thin and delicate porcelain. One is marked 'Japan' with a bouquet and the other is in Japanese.
Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
Beautiful pattern!
look at the left one the word japan is in it , and then look at the the american McKingley act 1891 = the word nippon annoucement obligation
actually the further restriction and practical implementation ( because the man in street did,nt understand a f... of it was in 1921, namelijke The english word Japan was mandatory
so it looks like what is called an theoratical .
shut out, IMO there are more theoratical and technical shut out , but it not that important, so it is in the best case scenario an taisho 1 plate as the under limit parameter the upper parameter goed rather high as far as i know only Noritake use pictograms as addendum early
the second plate in theory this could be late mejji , because it sells well for crooked people
IMo you did a rather assessment about the technical state namely the taxanomy of transfer ware,
actually the plate is known but i forgot were , so we take the tourist way
the Kanji reads but GREAT dai nippon ,and Not dai nippon looks like splitting ants but it aint, because it coincides with the determinant of the japanese nationalism revival and that started mid Taisho 1
let,s do it the technical way if it early or Mejji Igezara ware (compare)is not that static another kind of blue
let,s do it the commercial by far the hype of this was taisho
another technical way why the inconsistencies , karakusa design front and not back but lagellation is not typically meijji, so it is Taisho 1 and up
correction flagellation design
thanks apostata! now i need to find someone to translate your reply!
ok we start all over again if you say what you are missing
and i gonna learn you if you want understanding an Ching Dynasty marks chart not the linguistic way if you want but the cognitive psychological way by means of distinction and frequency to prioritize
i would love that apostata! i sometimes take a long time to decipher your meaning, but it usually comes to me eventually.
i forgot congrats with your Aster kangxi plate a week or ago , very nice
if i got an example in the future whe comprise a whole ching dynasty chart 1644-1912
so what looks like an overwhelming alfabet soup , ( like 60 crowfeet in the snow)we narrow to almost nothing
so like open mouth symbol = tongzhi ( end story of story)
ok 4 dots = kangzhi= is end of story etc etc rest is all duplication and all bullshit
Ho-o Bird (??)
The ho-o bird (also spelled houou) is a mythical creature adapted from Chinese mythology that incorporates parts of several creatures such as the rooster, mandarin duck, peacock, crane, and pheasant. This bird was misidentified as a phoenix or a "flying turkey" by Western consumers in the early twentieth century (Ross 2012:20,23; Walter 2012:125, 129). Ho-o birds are the main decorative element on Phoenix Ware, vessels decorated with a sometsuke transferprint (????) design that were popular exports from the early 1910s until the 1930s (Van Patten 1994:60); see Phoenix Ware (???).