Chinese bowl | ||
| Asian Antiques1 of 10167 |  |  |
jscott0363 loves this.
vinetia loves this.
prettymollie loves this.
Leelani loves this.
Bronmar loves this.
dav2no1 loves this.
mikelv85 loves this.
Newfld loves this.
fortapache loves this.
vcal loves this.
kwqd loves this.
vetraio50 loves this.Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate
Posted 3 months ago
surfdub66
(466 items)
Another gift.. i think poss older than 70s/80s Chinese bowl 11 inches across 4inches h ..
A bit of wear on this one & at some point someone has paid out to have it fixed so poss something special to them.. don't know the mark on base so any info very welcome ..
Many thanks sd
Create an account or login in order to post a comment.
Thanks all for your loves ;-)
insert Huáng de f?n c?i m?d?n húdiéjié
I never have seen the mark in mij whole life , idon,t know what checked the daiost symbols and emblems and auspicious symbols, my databansks which are very elaborate
i am far from an expert in this,i can,t substantiate, looks like what i call honest work , a sort of yellow ground famille rose flowers , peony,s probably , with what looks like a genuine bleachy look see peonies
Imo it is real old something like 1910, bird is probably Fenghuang - chinese phenix and letts call the green pretchel , the famous PIERCED ROCK from the Kangxi period
nicely done,painted with care, nice sliding in the coloration see right peonies,
wtf is wrong with this site, disturbance all the time, the inner plate got a feel of can,t explain e sort of understated equilibrim nice
most experts think this is made around 1950 , well they might be right i don,t know , because i am not an expert in this, i stick to this . i got a lot a lot of homework in this, so i only surrender until a hot shot come in
Thanks apostata. That's great I didn't think it was that old but did think it was an interesting mark..
Many thanks for your information sd.
well it is impossible te asses, actually you got marks and you got clearing ( permission of the gouverment that the might leave the country (which is called JIAN DING =stamped lackered you name)
well you called bij style or sampling etc sometimes 1000 pieces i only got 1 in the sampling ( there was 1 mark and 1 JIAN DING on )
most JIANG DING = the permission are between late 40 and late 80 , so a lot of say must be 40 and 80, well it does,not mean shit , because i got canton ware from 1860 which is cleared between between 1940-1980
the pointis the probably call it famille rose , but is an rose or is it an peony , nobody gives a shit probably but phenix + peony got a feel good meaning antroposophic , and fengua +rose not
the question is why is it so bleachy the white is like CHALK white, like in MinYAO ware white from the Straits or MINYAO from the Tongzhi
the point is white is the spread of the bleachnes, i don,t know butik think lets say to 1950
style does,not say much a prominent fengua ( like in straits ware but the color is off)
well the inner side off the bowl is nice and yhe overall look is nice, the outer side is weaker in mine opinion
most of the time i judge it bij well it is impossible te asses, actually you got marks and you got clearing ( permission of the gouverment that the might leave the country (which is called JIAN DING =stamped lackered you name)
well you called bij style or sampling etc sometimes 1000 pieces i only got 1 in the sampling ( there was 1 mark and 1 JIAN DING on )
most JIANG DING = the permission are between late 40 and late 80 , so a lot of say must be 40 and 80, well it does,not mean shit , because i got canton ware from 1860 which is cleared between between 1940-1980
the pointis the probably call it famille rose , but is an rose or is it an peony , nobody gives a shit probably but phenix + peony got a feel good meaning antroposophic , and fengua +rose not
the question is why is it so bleachy the white is like CHALK white, like in MinYAO ware white from the Straits or MINYAO from the Tongzhi
the point is white is the spread of the bleachnes, i don,t know butik think lets say to 1950
style does,not say much a prominent fengua ( like in straits ware but the color is off)
well the inner side off the bowl is nice and yhe overall look is nice, the outer side is weaker in mine opinion
well i still have to emphasize the meaning of the split jury , with some outrageous point of view , there was about consensus 1940-1450, well i agree about the upper parameter , not later than 1950 - some type of republic period , i got a minority point of vieuw concerning the underparameter, so it could be a not so well assessment of me
Thankyou apostata..
Your knowledge is very welcome & appreciated:-) sd