Share your favorites on Show & Tell
Post an item or

krysciobrad » collections

krysciobrad

Krysciobrad

Collections

Krysciobrad has not created any collections yet. What are collections?

Favorite Categories

Posts

See all 186
Antique Nippon Moriage Gilded Floral Swan Vase - Asianin Asian
Antique Japanese Inaba Nanaho Cloisonne Bottle Vase - Asianin Asian
Antique Chinese Qing Dynasty Lacquerware Box Gold Painted - Asianin Asian
Rare Late Edo Period Japanese Koto-Yaki Kotoware Akae Style Vase - Asianin Asian
Antique Meiji Period Japanese Large 9.5” Kutani Bowl “Go Players” - Asianin Asian
Antique Meiji Period Japanese Large 10.5” Kutani Bowl - Asianin Asian
19th Century Meissen Marked Floral Tea Cup and Dish - China and Dinnerwarein China and Dinnerw…
Chinese 19th Century Guangxu Era porcelain Tea Set & Dishes - Asianin Asian
Antique K.P.M. German Porcelain Scallop Dish w/Royal Monogram? - China and Dinnerwarein China and Dinnerw…
Chinese 19th Century Guangxu Era Famille Rose Wanshou Wujiang Bowl - Asianin Asian

Comments

  1. @apostata I believe it is. Not a gold leaf but a gold powder and lacquer mix.
  2. Apostata I say 1850 as a placeholder. I’ve stumbled upon an old catalogue from 1901 from the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Catalogue of Japanese Pottery by Edward S. Morse. It’s dated but very infor...
  3. @apostata , im not sure what those numbers are on the bottoms. I’ve bought numerous pieces from this estate and a good deal of them have these numbers in this red colored font. A price? Some sort o...
  4. Very informative read, my thanks again @Apostata!
  5. Yea this set wasn’t my cup of tea, pun intended. I got each piece for $1.99 and there are multiple items in the same pattern so I scooped them up.
  6. Thanks Apostata, I try to do as much research as I can. I always appreciate second opinions. I just gotta figure out the KPM and Meissen in the previous sections.
  7. You thinking late 20th century or late guangxu?
  8. @kwqd , those are nice pieces! Hard to believe people often pass them up.
  9. @kwqd , I dunno yet. What site did you use? Maybe I can find out some more info.
  10. @apostata , very nice! I’m always willing to learn more on far eastern porcelain.
  11. @apostata , Thanks again for the analysis!
  12. @Apostata , wow early Edo period. So like 1680-1700? If so it’s much older than predicted.
  13. @shareurpassion , quite well.
  14. @kivatinitz , that’s the same one too lol
  15. @vetraio50 , it kind of looks like a Britannia marking? The line at the bottom marking looks like the base where she would stand. Kinda similar but to worn.
  16. @ehunt , those are some of my favorites. The pink clambroth has faceted pontils from the 1850’s and is probably 1 1/8”. My favorite of the three!
  17. @apostata , I’ve posted some newer photos of root marks. Couldn’t find any good Manganese blooms to test. One of them have been repaired. I think a TL test might be a solution to help me uncover th...
  18. @apostata , yep! The acetone didn’t remove a speck of the paint.
  19. @Lugnuts , The hallmarks are quite worn, the gold looks a bit rough, but the acid test showed they were at least 18k. One of the marks looks like a bust of a woman, or some kind of animal head.
  20. @apostata , thank you for the info!
  21. Keramikos, thanks for the info!
  22. @racer4four , Thanks! I actually found a similar item online with the eye shape beads. They are Buddhist prayer beads :)
  23. @ho2cultcha , will do!
  24. @mp.kunst , thank you for helping me identifying this! I really need to brush up on my antique artworks, pun not indented haha.
  25. @AnythingObscure , Yes it is. Absolute monster of a piece haha, and for $35 I paid for it.
  26. @Bruce99 thanks! I will update once I have the chance.
  27. @keramikos , thanks! I’ll give it a try.
  28. @CanyonRoad , Thanks for the information! And yes the clay does have the black specks.
  29. @kwqd , https://www.linkstothepast.com/milwaukee/mkeartistsU.php https://books.google.com/books/about/Estate_of_Ruth_Langland_Holberg_Born_in.html?id=pXMztwAACAAJ These are the only links I...
  30. @HappyHourOwl , I know this bird is definitely neat! My cats agree as well so I have to keep it off. It’s still very loud.
  31. @Alfred101 , I was leaning towards Aultman as well. Excellent looking piece of machinery!
  32. @gargoylecollector , thanks!
  33. @dav2no1 , I removed it from the frame to look for an edition number or paper watermark, but there wasn’t. I believe it was a page removed from his human comedy lithograph book, I don’t know about th...
  34. Wow mystery solved!
  35. @dav2no1 , definitely! By far the best thing in there was a signed colored lithograph signed by Picasso! Going to have to get it appraised.
  36. @ho2cultcha , it’s bronze. The censer insert still has a gold shine to it. The weight of this piece is heavy, and it’s very durable... fell over while transporting it inside didn’t have a dent anyw...
  37. @dav2no1 ,thanks! It was an online auction thanks to COVID.
  38. @truthordare , Thanks! The hunt never stops!
  39. @carmenisacat , the main photo is the polished version. I ran out of my polishing solution so I just used a quick batch of Baking a Soda and a soft brush. But once you compare the two photos it’s a...
  40. @shareurpassion , Thanks! I’ve been trying to put a name to this piece for months. The thrift store I buy these from had a huge donation of Navajo Jewelry. I was told the day prior there was much m...
  41. @shareurpassion , Thanks for the info! I paid 12.88 for this piece at a thrift shop!
  42. It kinda reminds me of the Dior versions of Bulova
  43. Update: After a little more research I’ve found it closely resembles the 1953 Riviera Set.
  44. Thanks! I knew when I saw the torch it might of been Olympics. But I never knew about Izzy the ‘96 Atlanta Olympics mascot.
  45. Update: The case is 10KT Rose Gold
  46. @Gillian, whoops it’s actually 24 1/2”
  47. After some cleaning and research I believe this to be made by a GL & Co. I’ve taken some photos of the hallmarks as well. Can’t make out much on the hallmarks but the makers mark is legible G Loveri...
  48. @Broochman, I wonder if this is a 1941 stamp after comparing it to ones from the 50’s and 60’s. I wonder if it could be Moghul Collection? I know not all pieces had a patent mark.
  49. @Broochman, I was even thinking it was part of the 1951 Gems of India Collection rather than the 1965 Jewels of India. Since it doesn’t have a copyright mark.
  50. @Elisabethan, wow it’s gotta be related to that. The flag pole and hut/teepee is in the background. Very cool!
    51. See more

Loves

Signed by the artist Eidy?