Share your favorites on Show & Tell

? JAPANESE OR ASIAN PLATE

In Asian > Chinese Plates > Show & Tell.
Songwriter53's loves22 of 166Mystery BowlReposting - Asian Figure
9
Love it
1
Like it

Vynil33rpmVynil33rpm loves this.
Angel71Angel71 loves this.
Jade42Jade42 loves this.
ho2cultchaho2cultcha loves this.
Nan24Nan24 loves this.
lundylundy likes this.
auraaura loves this.
aghcollectaghcollect loves this.
vetraio50vetraio50 loves this.
Songwriter53Songwriter53 loves this.
See 8 more
Add to collection

    Please create an account, or Log in here

    If you don't have an account, create one here.


    Create a Show & TellReport as inappropriate


    Posted 13 years ago

    lundy
    (269 items)

    THIS PLATE I GOT AT A ESTATE SALE ,DONT KNOW THE MARKINGS ON THE BACK ,IT SEEMS VERY OLD HAND PAINTED . DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW I COULD FIND OUT WHAT IT SAYS .IVE LOOKED ON LINE ,CANT FIND THIS PLATE THANKS ther e must be someone out there thats knows asian porcelin

    Unsolved Mystery

    Help us close this case. Add your knowledge below.

    logo
    Chinese Plates
    See all
    16thC Antique Chinese Porcelain Ming Dynasty JiaJing Mark Dragon Phoenix Plate
    16thC Antique Chinese Porcelain Min...
    $91
    18th Century Chinese Blue and White Meat Dish Qianlong Period
    18th Century Chinese Blue and White...
    $64
    18th Century Chinese Mandarin Plate Yongzheng Period
    18th Century Chinese Mandarin Plate...
    $9
    18th Century Chinese Blue and White Meat Dish Qianlong Period
    18th Century Chinese Blue and White...
    $54
    logo
    16thC Antique Chinese Porcelain Ming Dynasty JiaJing Mark Dragon Phoenix Plate
    16thC Antique Chinese Porcelain Min...
    $91
    See all

    Comments

    1. lundy lundy, 13 years ago
      hi everyone does anyone know an exspert that can help me with this plate and my jar thanks
    2. lundy lundy, 11 years ago
      hi songwriter53, this is 1860s very beautiful
    3. lundy lundy, 11 years ago
      hi , would anyone know about this plate ,someone said it could be from the edo era 1860
    4. Songwriter53 Songwriter53, 11 years ago
      u stil have this?
    5. lundy lundy, 11 years ago
      hi all , I found out this plate could from the e,d,o era , 1860s possibly a shipwreak plate from japan , would anyone know the value of this thank you ,
    6. lundy lundy, 11 years ago
      hi shrine , maybe you know of this thank you
    7. shrine shrine, 11 years ago
      Lundy, it's chinese export porcelain in Qing dynasty, but can't tell you exact reign. I never come across any of this kind with gilded edge remains. I am not professional, but professional advise doesn't come free.
    8. lundy lundy, 9 years ago
      hi all any help would be great thank you ,
    9. ThebossMar, 7 years ago
      Japanese Kraak Plate. This is usually found in chinese style, but in this case, yours is Japanese Kraak.
    10. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      Oh my God that's great news thank you so much for the information thank you thank you
    11. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      Hi yop you are very smart thank you so much . Great. I still have it ty so much
    12. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      What do you think about this one thank you
    13. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      Hello all you collectors Happy Thanksgiving stay safe CARPE DIEM I didn't know maybe somebody might be on that knows anything about this plate thank you very much
    14. Nan24 Nan24, 4 years ago
      Beautiful plate
    15. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      Thank you very much for the comment that is so kind hope all is well with everybody
    16. ho2cultcha ho2cultcha, 4 years ago
      1800s - could be edo. based on Wanli Kraak ware. the brown rim might give you a date. nice plate!
    17. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      Thank you very much for the comment HO2
    18. apostata apostata, 4 years ago
      actually that is quite an addition of H2o , let,s say the japanese equivalent of chinese Wanli 1600-1620, but the trouble is the scallop brown rim i think exclude EDO with Kraak type
      i don,t know the mark i thought it was japanese , but you better stick to Shrine ,he is good in this as a layman i think is i think this is a late 19 century copy japanese kraak copy
    19. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      Thank you so much for the Commen aposata That is good to know Yes it seems very very old
    20. apostata apostata, 4 years ago
      don,t thank me because i am guessing , i am out of my league here, to me it is inconsistent, in the border on the bottom is lets say for discussion sake a sort of ball , attached to the ball is a dotted twig and a two dotted twig, a sort of late EDO, but actually i dont trust the piece , Shrine said its , its chinese and he is far better skilled expert than me , i think its Japanese
    21. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      I just want to say thank you to everyone I'm learning a lot from you Thank you very much again Two collectors weekly and all the collectors
    22. apostata apostata, 4 years ago
      actually is even more complicated , we all miss the essence me ( me also )This kanji character, KEN in Japanese is from the kanji characters of kenryu-nen-sei which is actually for the Chinese Qianlong period so equivalent of japanese EDO

      so this this japanese

      so you might think we are out of the woods , well that,s so obvious because , i think this is an uncommon combination for a HIZEN kiln because of the brownrim , so it could be EDO periode , but it also could be a knock of something like 1890 ( probably its EDO)
    23. apostata apostata, 4 years ago
      correction thats NOT so obvious
    24. lundy lundy, 4 years ago
      Thank you so much apozta
    25. apostata apostata, 3 years ago
      couldt get it out of my mind, so i ran some mamezara mokko gata nambam
      and i the saw official description for this type of pseudo Kraak mamezara, which was

      Kraak style with choclocate glazed foliate rim and applied cobalt blue decorated eight panels with bird and flower alternating with lotus motif surrounding a similarly decorated central roundel,

      the dating was quite accurate i see

      so the use is depending on the size

      schichisun zara 22*4cm
      Namasu zara 16*5cm
      kozara 11.5*2.8 cm
      mamezara 8*2 .8 cm

      in very ancient times if you interchanged the the kozara versus mamezara probably your head gonna be ripped off , nowadays no one gives a f,,, about the difference , the use is for condiment , salt sweets mustard , pickle sauce etc
    26. lundy lundy, 3 years ago
      Wow thank you apostate nice is it valuable
    27. lundy lundy, 3 years ago
      Thank you very much for the comments
    28. lundy lundy, 3 years ago
      No you didn't get censored thank you for the comments

    Want to post a comment?

    Create an account or login in order to post a comment.